Pages

Ipinapakita ang mga post na may etiketa na brain. Ipakita ang lahat ng mga post
Ipinapakita ang mga post na may etiketa na brain. Ipakita ang lahat ng mga post

Martes, Hulyo 10, 2012

The THINKing Brain


image courtesy of   http://mindfulbalance.org/  

The most reflective, autistic, deep, immeasurable, indescribable, unknowingly, weird, eclectic, imbalance, unexplainable, self-centered, developed, interesting, majestic, witty, stressful, in control, inconsiderate, mysterious, quirky, amusing, piercing, gay, whimsical, clever, adept, dippy, concealed, puzzling, and enigmatical part of the body is the brain. Yes, words are not enough to describe how uniquely created this body part is. (I know some of these words are negating but that’s how the brain works)

What if the brain is obvious and we can peek into the ideas of people? Do we need to live life and understand what it is or do we just sit on the couch and die? What if the brain doesn’t need any exercise and it is equally divided for each person? And is there even a need to study?

A lot of studies are actually written in books but nothing explains how my brain is different from yours. It is measured by how we adopt to certain situations and how we learn, work, and live but not any single thing explains the science of the thinking. The Brain is just a necessary part of the body – some are bigger than others, while some have lesser IQ, and some possess a mental capacity that most people don’t have. 

If the brain would be a teaser to one’s soul, we might as well live in a neurotic world.

Certain studies have been discussed but it just made my brain work and think. If others are logically inclined and others are communicators, how are we going to measure it? Medical people, theorists, teachers, and pragmatists are all looking to details on how it works but no one can provide a measurable answer. If a no brainer guy hooks you up, would you be surprised to know that he knows nothing?

In my opinion, the importance of discovering how the brain works is just a societal responsibility. We can adapt easily to our surroundings and just change every time we deal with it. One of the characteristics of man is said to be being contagious that we are living in a world of affection. If we measure the brain based on creativity we can say that Michael Angelo was a genius boy, Shakespeare sang most number of pop music, and Da Vinci walked in a straight path. However, Einstein is our standard of being a genius for he discovered the E=MC2 and we can’t deny that fact - that he is indeed, the epitome of “intelligence”.

Based on the Whole Brain Model, the brain has four functions. If you are logical, organized, creative and emotional, you must be hitting a side on your brain. As man continues to discover or do a research regarding the brain, they are limited on the HOWS of the brain and not on the WHATS. Indeed, the brain is the main source of creativity and it is very hard to question or study the brain, because we can only get the answers from brain itself. My main concern, though, about the brain is not on the style or on the mode of learning, thinking and working but on how we become creative as we use this vital part of the body. If we visualized something, it is like a “theory” inside the brain that is waiting to be explored and defined.

Thinking has been a practice ever since the world began. Man thinks according to what he sees, knows , or according to what is inside his brain. If we look into history, man also evolved in thinking as per, visual thinking -  by becoming more imaginative and creative. But we don’t limit ourselves by identifying that the “modern man” thinks more creatively than the traditional ones. All I am suggesting is that in today’s world, one must be creative to survive

We can’t define man based on the part of brain he is using. If a left-brainer is said to be more logical, we can’t typecast everyone that every right-brainer is not logical or nonetheless intuitive. Studies have shown the IQ is not affected by the part of the brain a man uses but on the process which he used the specific part. If we describe a right-brainer person, it should be holistic, random, concrete, intuitive, non-verbal/spatial , and fantasy -oriented , but at the end of the day, we need both users to project a specific task. 

As once quoted, “thinking styles indicate preferred modes of learning and working, not competence.” Thus, the use of thinking style in identifying your mode of learning will not affect your competence. You may be an organizer but you can also be a communicator. Competence is not measured on the process, but by the end product. Everyone has their own way to enrich his competence and it will not be determined by the type or style by which we learn.

In a nutshell, a great mind doesn’t use a specific part of the brain. This helps in identifying your potential but the result will still vary according to the degree of willingness to learn. A student can grow more, certainly, but it is not assured that with all those theories and principles, one will top the class. For man can’t decipher how the brain functions and we can only make all necessary tests, but at the end,  it will not provide us definite answers because our brain is unique, each working different from the rest.